PDA

View Full Version : Ruger's new double barrel revolver.


Lonestar grips.
12-31-2015, 10:21 PM
you people need to read before you post. this was a fake.

Riverpigusmc
12-31-2015, 10:35 PM
looks like catsh*t on a hot tar road

Caleb
12-31-2015, 10:58 PM
Not my cup of tea.

sdmc530
12-31-2015, 11:57 PM
Ugly as mr. Lutz

Sheepdog
01-01-2016, 12:44 AM
Somebody in marketing is going to get fired.funny

Lonestar grips.
01-01-2016, 01:31 AM
Ugly as mr. Lutz

funny

MajO
01-01-2016, 07:54 AM
Looks pretty "swucked" up to me. Yuch! :eek:

flphotog
01-01-2016, 07:58 AM
it's interesting lol.

I think for the price i'd rather just carry two revolvers though.


http://www.realguns.com/articles/785.htm

I'll pass, not much of a Ruger fanboy anyway.

milkmanjoe
01-01-2016, 08:19 AM
People actually think of this stuff and then build it...too bizarre...though I do admit I like the dual barrel 1911

Gatorade
01-01-2016, 09:12 AM
Did anyone read past the first paragraph or two? It seemed so bizarre I skimmed down and the article doesn't seem real. Maybe this was an April 1st instead of January 1st release?

milkmanjoe
01-01-2016, 09:28 AM
Did anyone read past the first paragraph or two? It seemed so bizarre I skimmed down and the article doesn't seem real. Maybe this was an April 1st instead of January 1st release?

Yup, read the whole thing...when it got to Denny's in Passaic, NJ, I knew it was BS. I was referring to that fact that this pistol was actually built for the article.

Gatorade
01-01-2016, 03:48 PM
Yup, read the whole thing...when it got to Denny's in Passaic, NJ, I knew it was BS. I was referring to that fact that this pistol was actually built for the article.

Really? I thought it was just photoshop but if someone seriously built that I don't know if its engineering genius or stupidity!

Caleb
01-01-2016, 03:54 PM
I did not read the article. Saw the pics and said, "nope, not for me" , then closed the page.

milkmanjoe
01-01-2016, 04:57 PM
Really? I thought it was just photoshop but if someone seriously built that I don't know if its engineering genius or stupidity!

Could be photoshop...even that would be a waste of time. My brother used to build props for a paper separator for cereal boxes. He could build the whackiest, non working machines in hours, send them out to be chromed and they were real impressive....useless, but impressive.

skosh69
01-01-2016, 05:59 PM
Somebody in marketing is going to get fired.funny

The entire design team and whoever approved it needs to be fired.

That monstrosity is just plain fugly.

DrHenley
01-01-2016, 06:41 PM
January Fool's Day...:rolleyes:

Conclusions

Finally, we can talk about this product!. Three months ago, six of us in the press had pillow cases dropped over our respective heads, we were stuffed into the back of a 2006 Ford Escape and spirited away to a Denny's backroom in downtown Passaic, NJ. Once there, Marque Civière briefed us, put on a Swuck slide show presentation, did some bird imitations, then cabbage patched and moon walked while extolling the virtues of the Swuck. We were then held captive until we pinky swore that we would each tell no more than 1,500 of our closest friends about the Swuck before its official release.

http://www.cotep.org/forum/picture.php?albumid=98&pictureid=1046

gaguideman
09-04-2016, 10:02 AM
Would be interesting to get your hands on though just to have something odd in your collection. Might one day have value. Can't ever tell.

Gatorade
09-04-2016, 10:54 AM
Would be interesting to get your hands on though just to have something odd in your collection. Might one day have value. Can't ever tell.

Wow! Back from a 2 year absence? Welcome home! You have some catching up to do, pigs wildfire comes to mind. Still good to see you back.

AFJuvat
09-04-2016, 10:59 AM
Interesting concept. Seems to be a solution looking for a problem.

Lonestar grips.
09-04-2016, 03:32 PM
y'all do know this is fake right?

pitor
09-04-2016, 11:06 PM
Photoshop. Look at the bottom barrel, it even has sights on it, whomever did the Photoshop job just inverted the section of the original barrel and called it a day, c'mon!

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

DrHenley
09-05-2016, 08:08 AM
Designer: John Galt
Weight - Actual: 271 Oz
Width: 2.3"
Frame: Stainless Megalunium
Cylinder: Osmium Plus


http://www.cotep.org/forum/picture.php?albumid=98&pictureid=1046

Arley
09-05-2016, 10:37 AM
If I got it for free I would keep it and shoot it . Looks like fun .

DrHenley
09-05-2016, 02:09 PM
Over 2 inches wide and 17 pounds?

I dunno...Doesn't sound like much fun to me.


http://www.cotep.org/forum/picture.php?albumid=98&pictureid=1046