COTEP.org  

Go Back   COTEP.org > Firearms > Other Semiauto Pistols

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-17-2012, 11:01 AM
Brandana Brandana is offline
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 46
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Sig 1911 Traditional Compact

I have ordered a Sig Traditional Compact SS. It was one of the few all stainless CCO's I could find. Does anyone have one of these models? I plan to use it mostly as a range and truck gun, not as a carry piece. Planning on putting a magwell msh and new grips, plus removing the fpb. This is my first Sig, any suggestions?

Last edited by Brandana; 11-29-2012 at 11:09 AM. Reason: additional info
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-21-2012, 08:33 AM
Razorwire's Avatar
Razorwire Razorwire is offline
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Deep in the woods of Arkansas
Posts: 367
Thanks: 87
Thanked 90 Times in 23 Posts
Default

Just one question: Why a compact for a range gun? I understand the part about a compact as a truck gun. My "truck gun" is a Mattel, or Wham-O, or Glock, yeah thats it, Glock. Just don't feel like throwing my Sigs or DW on the seat of the truck and heading out.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-21-2012, 08:49 AM
Boats's Avatar
Boats Boats is offline
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SE Virginia
Posts: 1,255
Thanks: 31
Thanked 86 Times in 39 Posts
Default

So I have their Carry (commander sized) model. Also all SS, though finished with their Nitron coating so looks black.

It's about as tight, reliable, and accurate a gun I have seen at the price point.

I carry it sometimes, like today. The only thing I have done to it is change the grips and better polish the feed ramps. It reliably feeds anything I load up, including hand loaded JHPs. Trigger is awesome right out of the box.

I bet you'll be happy with that pistol!

__________________
If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.
-- Samuel Adams
COTEP CBOB0676
KO4ENQ
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-21-2012, 04:25 PM
Brandana Brandana is offline
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 46
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Razorwire View Post
Just one question: Why a compact for a range gun? I understand the part about a compact as a truck gun. My "truck gun" is a Mattel, or Wham-O, or Glock, yeah thats it, Glock. Just don't feel like throwing my Sigs or DW on the seat of the truck and heading out.
I have two government Models and they are great for the range and for some reason have not bought a Commander, yet. Since buying a DW CCO it has become my favorite 1911. I bought the all stainless Sig because it is heavier and adding a magwell will extend the grip about 1/4" which should do well at the range. The alloy CCO's and Officer's are great for carry but too light for extended range shooting. This is something I have been thinking about for awhile, kind of an experiment for me. Besides I needed another shiny BBQ gun and I sold all of my plastic for metal. Well, I do have one plastic rig, a FNP-45 , just can't get rid of that big ole 14+1 gal.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-24-2012, 02:22 PM
Razorwire's Avatar
Razorwire Razorwire is offline
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Deep in the woods of Arkansas
Posts: 367
Thanks: 87
Thanked 90 Times in 23 Posts
Default

I agree. I have more of an attachment towards my metal guns than I do with my plastic ones. I do believe though that the plastic guns serve a purpose. I have actually gotten to the point that I carry my Sig 1911 more than my Glock 27. I only carried my Glock 22s on duty, and of the 4 that I owned, have sold or traded off 3 of them.
__________________
I may be crazy, but it keeps me from going insane

John CBOB0692
US Army (Retired) Jul 64-Feb 85
LIFE MEMBER, National Rifle Association
LIFE MEMBER, Disabled American Veterans
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-25-2012, 05:51 PM
Brandana Brandana is offline
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 46
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

If I had to carry a duty pistol weight and capacity would be a consideration. Plastic does have a purpose and seems to be dominating the market. My preference for metal started with CZ's in 9mm and has drifted towards the 1911 45's over time. When warm and in shorts and t-shirts my LCP (oops, two plastic guns) is a matter of convenience, but do feel under gunned. Since winter is here I am making a point of carrying my ECO. It is easy to carry, but don't generally need to carry for long periods of time as you. I am curious to see how this Sig CCO carries. Also have a CZ compact 9mm which is comfortable to carry and should weigh about the same as the Sig. Should be picking up the Sig tomorrow and take her to the range later this week.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-25-2012, 06:46 PM
BadOscar's Avatar
BadOscar BadOscar is offline
Founding Member
Admimberistrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Maine
Posts: 1,492
Blog Entries: 4
Thanks: 771
Thanked 407 Times in 70 Posts
Default

I have one of the original 2004 DW CCO's that is all Stainless Steel. I shot an alloy CCO just the other day and it makes a big difference, I was actually surprised how much more controlable my all steel CCO is.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-25-2012, 10:04 PM
Brandana Brandana is offline
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 46
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BadOscar View Post
I have one of the original 2004 DW CCO's that is all Stainless Steel. I shot an alloy CCO just the other day and it makes a big difference, I was actually surprised how much more controlable my all steel CCO is.
I'm glad you shared that, just supports my feelings about the allloy frame cco's which are great for carry but not so great if shooting a lot of rounds at the range. Too bad DW doesn't offer both in the cco. The only choice for an all ss cco I could find was Sig and of course Colt if you can find one. I will find out the difference this week.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-27-2012, 10:38 PM
Brandana Brandana is offline
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 46
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Well, I picked her up yesterday and of course had to strip her down, clean and do a lube job. While apart I had to tweak the grip safety spring because it was loose and had an irritating rattle. The trigger was fairly good at 5.25 lbs. so I tweak it down to about 4.25 lbs. which feels more like my other 1911's. The weight was around 34oz. which is exactly what I wanted. This gal is really tight, took a bit of racking to smooth the action. To my surprise the mags are the same as my DW's, Checkmate 7 rounders, which I already had extra's. The Sig mags are unmarked but have the same patent# on the follower. I'm liking this one already.

These are the factory grips.


These are a set of magwell grips that look good without the magwell. I perfer these style grips on 1911's.


The mag on the left is a DW Checkmate and the right is factory Sig. Blurred pic.


Hope to make it to the range this week.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-01-2012, 10:58 PM
Brandana Brandana is offline
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 46
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thumbs up

My S&A magwell/msh came in today. I'm REALLY liking this CCO now that the grip is 1/4" longer.




Thanks to a post on the 1911forum by old-lefty I was able put this together.

Last edited by Brandana; 12-08-2012 at 09:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.