![]() |
Ruger's new double barrel revolver.
you people need to read before you post. this was a fake.
|
looks like catsh*t on a hot tar road
|
Not my cup of tea.
|
Ugly as mr. Lutz
|
Somebody in marketing is going to get fired.funny
|
Quote:
|
Looks pretty "swucked" up to me. Yuch! :eek:
|
Quote:
|
People actually think of this stuff and then build it...too bizarre...though I do admit I like the dual barrel 1911
|
Did anyone read past the first paragraph or two? It seemed so bizarre I skimmed down and the article doesn't seem real. Maybe this was an April 1st instead of January 1st release?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I did not read the article. Saw the pics and said, "nope, not for me" , then closed the page.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
That monstrosity is just plain fugly. |
January Fool's Day...:rolleyes:
Quote:
|
Would be interesting to get your hands on though just to have something odd in your collection. Might one day have value. Can't ever tell.
|
Quote:
|
Interesting concept. Seems to be a solution looking for a problem.
|
y'all do know this is fake right?
|
Photoshop. Look at the bottom barrel, it even has sights on it, whomever did the Photoshop job just inverted the section of the original barrel and called it a day, c'mon!
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk |
Designer: John Galt
Weight - Actual: 271 Oz Width: 2.3" Frame: Stainless Megalunium Cylinder: Osmium Plus http://www.cotep.org/forum/picture.p...pictureid=1046 |
If I got it for free I would keep it and shoot it . Looks like fun .
|
Over 2 inches wide and 17 pounds?
I dunno...Doesn't sound like much fun to me. http://www.cotep.org/forum/picture.p...pictureid=1046 |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:53 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.