This amounts to confiscation without ever being convicted of anything. There should be a court hearing and a ruleing made as to the competence of the individual before personal property is siezed. There are people in the mental health community that would say firearm ownership is an indication that a person is unstable, used in that context anyone that has a firearm should have it taken away. This isn't complicated, some people in government would like to sieze all privately owned firearms and will use any excuse to do so. Catch 22 ring any bells ?
|