View Single Post
  #1  
Old 06-17-2013, 01:02 PM
Roverron's Avatar
Roverron Roverron is offline
Founding Member
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: USA, America
Posts: 3,974
Thanks: 71
Thanked 540 Times in 279 Posts
Default Accused Fort Hood gunman cannot use defending Taliban defense

[Army psychiatrist Major Nidal Hasan cannot argue at trial that he was defending the Afghan Taliban when he opened fire in a 2009 shooting rampage at Fort Hood, Texas, that killed 13 people, a military judge ruled on Friday...]

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/...95D0WW20130614
--------------------
And the reason he can't use that is because the administration does not want this incident to be labeled a terrorist attack.
It is currently labeled a work place violence incident. No matter that he was screaming "Aloha Snackbar" all the time he was killing and wounding American Soldiers. This trial is not about justice. Its about politics, and protecting the villiage idiot.
4 years later and this homegrown turd is still on trial. What a waste of taxpayer money.
__________________
Ron
#CBOB0604
Proud Member: "Team Ranstad"
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Roverron For This Useful Post:
dw1911 (06-21-2013)