Quote:
Originally Posted by milkmanjoe
No such thing a "ass" guns or weapons.
Only the military and LE have select fire weapons, so, the word "assault" as tied to today's ar platform is a carefully constructed switch on words that Democraps have been manipulating since molester Bill Clinton was in office. Remember his manipultaion of "is". Every ar in possession in Connecticut that is non select fire is nothing more than a sporting rifle.
To count the platform in Ct. is impossible. There are guns dating back decades that were never known about. Those owners dare never surface. And there are alot of them. Also, since the unconstitutional law that directly infringes on Ct residents was put in place, nobody knows what guns left the state for storage elsewhere, or how many non registered were imported "just in case". What the people of Ct need to do is group together, hire the most powerful pro Constitution law firm available, and have the law declared unconstitutional, thus suspending it forever. Law Enforcement up in Ct is at a sort of impasse, stating they will uphold laws. Yet there are pro gun LEO's who have no interest in restricting law abiding people, and they don't want to get shot trying to go door to door. Not to mention going door to door, on sheer volume of residences, is impossible.
The legal route is the way to go, immediately.
|
No shit, we all know that. You can harangue the point all you want. Many here in Connecticut do. They did for tens of weeks leading up to the law change. Just like Colorado, and New York. How did that argument work?
The fact of the matter is that our shit hole legislators in the US have allowed a progressive definition change since the mid 1970's. The definitions currently in law in Connecticut disagrees with you.
Arguing that point is nothing but a non sequitur and red herring. That argument is used as a litmus test to disavow, deride, and categorize the argument user a partisan against x policy.
The argument needs to be on the validity of the law, not on the classification of a single gun or word. To many here in CT are using sophistry arguments to the n'th degree. They are failing because after hearing the litmus test spoken people of moderate to semi right persuasion have tuned out. It has become clear that the cases and Federal judges here in the North East have no where to go. Even given a good supreme court ruling, it is very unlikely we will see a reversion to the law prior to this.
What will most likely happen is the law will be amended in single action points so that each change is a law unto its self. Requiring each one to be challenged, heard, decided upon individually. Dragging the issue out for decades.
As for people saying they are in support of CT. I think that is talk, nothing more. Here is why. The rest of the nation is sick of hearing "how to live" from the great north east. Which has a habit of pontificating life. How many times have you thought New York City should just shut the fuck up. When it comes down to it, we will see a similar issue as Detroit. Let the region die in its own festering vomit. Those of the more conservative and gun minded liberal persuasion will leave. I know i am hoping to soon, I know one other on this board that is also. Aside from that i can count probably 5 firearms holders who are in the process of relocating. The general thought is, the fight is null and lost here. Better to move to a state when we have a larger minority and better chance of making a large issue out of this.