View Single Post
  #12  
Old 11-18-2014, 11:16 PM
Sheepdog's Avatar
Sheepdog Sheepdog is offline
Founding Member
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Mason, Texas
Posts: 3,494
Thanks: 302
Thanked 357 Times in 75 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skosh69 View Post
So why aren't there more Glock race guns than 2011's, based on the 1911, race guns in Limited and Open division USPSA? Some of these guys have mags that hold 28 rounds. I know there is the Glock team and I have seen some tricked out Glocks, a member here builds them, but never the less, so far I've seen far fewer of them at both comps then any other gun.

Not trying to pick a fight with you brother, just trying to understand.

I guess it really all boils down to personal preference. I've shot a Glock, didn't like it...not one bit. I will not buy a gun based on functionality, especially if it's FUGLY!

Enjoy your Glock, I'll enjoy my M&P and together we'll enjoy our 1911's
I'll put my 2011's up against any Glock. Lets face it Glocks are a great $400 gun. If they cost a $1000 nobody would own one.

In answer to your question;

They have the ergonomics of a brick.

If you have ever pulled the trigger on one, thats self explanatory.

Lock time of a flintlock

Kaboom!

Stamped steel parts.
__________________
canis fidelis cave canem, vereor non magnus nocens lupus

In hoc signo vinces

If you can list them, you ain't got enough!!!

Life Member NRA, SCI, ATA, NSCA
COTEP 414

Last edited by Sheepdog; 11-18-2014 at 11:24 PM.
Reply With Quote