COTEP.org  

Go Back   COTEP.org > Main Category > News and Politics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-19-2014, 09:47 PM
MPDC's Avatar
MPDC MPDC is offline
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 524
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 118
Thanked 162 Times in 35 Posts
Default The Joke Is On Us!

Got this in an email, like there isn't enough pissing me off!


The Clintons-The Joke Is On Us


Read how the joke's on us!


Hillary Rodham Clinton, as a New York State Senator, now comes under this fancy "Congressional Retirement and Staffing Plan," which means that even if she never gets re-elected, she STILL receives her Congressional salary until she dies.

If Bill out-lives her, he then inherits HER salary until HE dies. He is already getting his Presidential salary until he dies. If Hillary out-lives Bill, she also gets HIS salary until she dies.
Guess who pays for that? WE DO.

It's common knowledge that in order for her to establish NY
residency, they purchased a million dollar-plus house in upscale Chappaqua. New York . Makes sense. They are entitled to Secret Service protection for life. Still makes sense.

Here is where it becomes interesting.
Their mortgage payments hover at around $10,000 per month. BUT, an extra residence HAD to be built by the Government within the acreage to house the Secret Service agents. Any improvement to property is owned by the property owners...
the Clinton 's.

SO.....the Clinton 's charge the Federal government $10,000
monthly rent for the use of that extra residence, which is just about equal to their mortgage payment. The ONLY EX-president to use this loophole. This means that we, the taxpayers, pay the Clinton 's salary, mortgage, transportation, safety and security, as well as the salaries for their 12 man staff and this is all perfectly legal!

When she runs for President, will you vote for her? NO!

And she has the gall to say that they were broke when they left the White House.
__________________
God is great, beer is good, people are crazy!
USMC 66-69 Sgt E-5, "Wing wiper "
COTEP #744
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to MPDC For This Useful Post:
douglas_knott (07-19-2014), jmlutz (07-20-2014), milkmanjoe (07-20-2014), Riverpigusmc (07-19-2014), sdmc530 (07-20-2014)
  #2  
Old 07-20-2014, 12:09 AM
milkmanjoe's Avatar
milkmanjoe milkmanjoe is offline
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Fl or SC, wherever my wife banishes me to
Posts: 4,227
Thanks: 736
Thanked 383 Times in 88 Posts
Default

Seems to be contagious....

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...ntal/?page=all
__________________
CBOB0716

"The most basic right that we have emanates from our Creator and it is that unalienable right to life. We stand firmly on the principle that from conception until the last breath is drawn, life is sacred.”

Political Correctness is a doctrine, recently fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and promoted by a sick mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a piece of shit by the clean end!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-20-2014, 09:22 AM
Gatorade's Avatar
Gatorade Gatorade is offline
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 2,615
Thanks: 802
Thanked 643 Times in 156 Posts
Default

Secret service protection is not free for life. It is free for something like 10 years after office and then they have to pay after that. It may have been changed during Bush so maybe they are free for life. I will check and post back.
__________________
CBOB0746
NRA Life Member
Florida CWL Since 1992
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-20-2014, 09:29 AM
Gatorade's Avatar
Gatorade Gatorade is offline
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 2,615
Thanks: 802
Thanked 643 Times in 156 Posts
Default

Looks like I was right and wrong. It was life and in 1997 changed to 10 years then in 2012 changed back to life.

From Wikipedia:

The original act provided for lifetime Secret Service for former presidents. In 1997, it was reduced to 10 years for presidents taking office after 1997. The 1997 amendment was reverted by the Former Presidents Protection Act of 2012 (Public Law 112-257).[2] All living former presidents and their spouses are now entitled to receive lifetime Secret Service protection.[3]
__________________
CBOB0746
NRA Life Member
Florida CWL Since 1992
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-20-2014, 09:33 AM
Gatorade's Avatar
Gatorade Gatorade is offline
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 2,615
Thanks: 802
Thanked 643 Times in 156 Posts
Default

Honestly I don't have an issue with Presedential protection or pensions for life. I see it as respect for the office. Even if you don't respect the person who held it.
__________________
CBOB0746
NRA Life Member
Florida CWL Since 1992
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-20-2014, 10:07 AM
guitargain's Avatar
guitargain guitargain is offline
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Taylor, Florida
Posts: 78
Thanks: 8
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I don't necessarily have a problem with protection for life, but I do have a problem with charging rent. These people are scumbags.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-20-2014, 10:22 AM
Shadow's Avatar
Shadow Shadow is offline
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: South Florida
Posts: 152
Thanks: 9
Thanked 70 Times in 12 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by guitargain View Post
I don't necessarily have a problem with protection for life, but I do have a problem with charging rent. These people are scumbags.
Washington Post, Jan. 13, 2001: A Secret Service representative misspoke in the Reliable Source in the Jan. 12 Style section. The Clintons are entitled to collect rent from the agency for space at their Chappaqua, N.Y., home but have declined the payments of about $1,100 a month, said White House press secretary Jake Siewert.
__________________
COTEP #0749

I changed my car horn to gun shot sounds. People move out of the way much faster now
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-20-2014, 10:32 AM
Shadow's Avatar
Shadow Shadow is offline
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: South Florida
Posts: 152
Thanks: 9
Thanked 70 Times in 12 Posts
Default

As Lloyd Grove reported in the Washington Post:

It is a standard arrangement that the Secret Service provide payment to homeowners for space used by the agency in such situations. The Clintons did not take it upon themselves to "charge the Secret Service rent."

The amount provided is based on a government formula, not set by the homeowner, and in the Clintons' case this amount is $1,100. (Note that this figure was not chosen by the Clintons, and it is well short of their monthly mortgage payment.)

Most important, although regulations call for the payment of this amount, the Clinton's have not in fact accepted any money from the Secret Service.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-20-2014, 10:34 AM
LittleGator's Avatar
LittleGator LittleGator is offline
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: South Florida
Posts: 619
Thanks: 122
Thanked 48 Times in 9 Posts
Default

MPDC, I feel your pain. I don't like the Clintons anymore than you do; but, the system is broken. It is not just them. Most elected officials from the President on down benefit from laws they pass to make them wealthy, comfortable and secure. They have pensions, perks, benefits, etc. that your average citizen can only dream about.

We do not have a monarchy, but we sure do have a political class which has evolved into something like the old monarchical systems. The Tudors, Savoys, Bourbons and Habsburgs have been replaced by the Kennedys, Bushes, Clintons, etc.; and, various and sundry others at the Congressional and local levels.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-20-2014, 10:38 AM
Shadow's Avatar
Shadow Shadow is offline
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: South Florida
Posts: 152
Thanks: 9
Thanked 70 Times in 12 Posts
Default

Where is the outrage here ?? (last sentence, bolded)

The Secret Service is notorious for its reluctance to discuss even mundane aspects of how it carries out its duties, so authoritative information about the setup of the Clinton home in New York state is hard to come by. However, around the time of the Chappaqua purchase, the press estimated that a permanent, taxpayer-funded security system worth more than $1 million would have to be installed to adequately protect the President. Security measures of this level are not specific to the Clintons; the homes of all Presidents are treated this way, as (to a lesser extent) are the homes of former Presidents.

In each case the costs of installation and maintenance for the security systems comes from public funds, because the protection of First Families is viewed as a right and proper charge upon the nation. (In 1981, the Secret Service spent several months providing round-the-clock protection, at a cost of tens of thousands of dollars per day, for an empty Pacific Palisades, California, home owned by Ronald and Nancy Reagan — even though the Reagans no longer lived in or used the house, and even though it was vacant and up for sale.)
Reply With Quote
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.