|
|
| Register | Forums | Blogs | Today's Posts | Search | Donate |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
#1
06-04-2018, 12:20 PM
|
|||||
|
|||||
SCOTUS rules in favor of Baker!!!
In a carefully watched decision, SCOTUS has ruled in favor of the Colorado Baker who refused to bake a cake for a LGBTQ couple's wedding....
Hopefully, this will bode well for us in re: our 2A cases that may come before them soon. Still, we need to get more conservatives on the bench. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...ex-couple.html 
|
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to FfNJGTFO For This Useful Post: | ||
|
#2
06-04-2018, 12:54 PM
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Homer and the sexuals will be going apesh*t
__________________
NRA Life Member Wilson Combat CQB Kimber Tactical Pro II S&W J-Frame .38 ect " I don't own the clothes I'm wearin', and the road goes on forever "  There's a gator in the bushes, and it's calling my name... COTEP #523
|
|
#3
06-04-2018, 01:32 PM
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Lmao..... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
**I have been Enlightened**
|
|
#4
06-04-2018, 05:07 PM
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Main stream media this morning was saying that the Baker's position was won by a slim margin. Hmmmm.... 7 to 2 is slim???? go figger...
__________________
COTEP: CBOB578 DW CCO SIG GSR 1911 SA Micro Compact and a spectacular cast of others! "You have never lived, until you have almost died. And for those who fight for it, life has a flavor that the protected will never know." Guy de Maupassant, 1893. Anonymously, penned on a sign at a command post at Khe Sanh, RVN.
|
|
#5
06-04-2018, 05:47 PM
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Well, the decision was a narrow one. Apparently, it applied only to the specific case brought to them by the original Baker. It really didn't address the whole issue of whether or not a business can "express religious freedom" in the way the baker attempted to do.... That may or may not come later, but we'll see.
|
Hybrid Mode