COTEP.org  

Go Back   COTEP.org > Main Category > News and Politics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-28-2017, 07:43 AM
FfNJGTFO's Avatar
FfNJGTFO FfNJGTFO is offline
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Wesley Chapel, FL
Posts: 1,636
Thanks: 1,507
Thanked 206 Times in 71 Posts
Default A Scarlet Letter for Gun Owners

Gun Talk - A Scarlet Letter for Gun Owners

Apparently, a grandfather in Michigan was seeking custody of his grandson. The State Dept. of HHS, via a caseworker, advised him that to be awarded custody, "you'll have to provide all the serial numbers of your guns." And the judge who heard the appeal, apparently, concurred with that order... "We know we are violating numerous constitutional rights here, but if you do not comply, we will remove the boy from your home..."



Apparently, SAF is taking them on. We'll see where that case goes. The are some things, though, that I'd want to know about the case. First, how did the State Dept. of HHS find out that the grandfather was a gun owner in the first place? Are firearms ID's and transactions "public record" in Michigan? Did a family member "rat" on the grandfather? Also, assuming the judge did say those things, I'd want to bring that judge up against the judiciary regulatory board for such a flagrant violation. I guess that judge feels safe in imposing those orders.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to FfNJGTFO For This Useful Post:
Gatorade (07-28-2017), sdmc530 (07-29-2017)
  #2  
Old 07-28-2017, 08:18 AM
Caleb's Avatar
Caleb Caleb is offline
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Earth
Posts: 11,457
Thanks: 4,190
Thanked 1,137 Times in 254 Posts
Default

I'm so glad to live in a free state.
__________________
**I have been Enlightened**
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-28-2017, 08:18 AM
JohnR's Avatar
JohnR JohnR is offline
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 137
Thanks: 7
Thanked 40 Times in 9 Posts
Default

I've been following that on other forums. Benefit of the doubt - maybe the judge knew the law was wrong to require gun serial numbers, but there isn't a damn thing he can do about it. Judges have to follow the rule of law, they can't change it or ignore it.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-28-2017, 03:45 PM
TLE2's Avatar
TLE2 TLE2 is offline
Founding Member
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Near Okahoma City
Posts: 2,831
Blog Entries: 5
Thanks: 547
Thanked 379 Times in 83 Posts
Default

I've seen such things pop up even in Oklahoma.
__________________

COTEP #719


"Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed one." - Thomas Jefferson quoting Cesare Beccaria
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-28-2017, 04:04 PM
RKP's Avatar
RKP RKP is offline
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Gods country USA
Posts: 5,797
Thanks: 1,901
Thanked 781 Times in 255 Posts
Default

I wouldn't get all worked up over this Arnold, I'd bet that judge will get set straight.

Just as a good example, my BIL/SIL became foster parents for a brother/sister. The BIL/SIL own a farm and are in to guns (pistols/rifles/shotguns, etc.) and, after divulging they owed guns all they had to do was prove/show that they had a gun safe which would secure all of them. The brother/sister are now living on said farm and learning gun safety and shooting and are in 'hog heaven' !!
__________________
Rich
COTEP #762

A gun is a tool, no better or no worse than any other tool: an axe, a shovel or anything. A gun is as good or as bad as the man using it. Remember that.

And shepherds we shall be, for Thee, my Lord, for Thee.
Power hath descended forth from Thy hand, that our feet may swiftly carry out Thy command.
So we shall flow a river forth to Thee, and teeming with souls shall it ever be.
In nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus Sancti.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-28-2017, 05:11 PM
FfNJGTFO's Avatar
FfNJGTFO FfNJGTFO is offline
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Wesley Chapel, FL
Posts: 1,636
Thanks: 1,507
Thanked 206 Times in 71 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RKP View Post
I wouldn't get all worked up over this Arnold, I'd bet that judge will get set straight.

Just as a good example, my BIL/SIL became foster parents for a brother/sister. The BIL/SIL own a farm and are in to guns (pistols/rifles/shotguns, etc.) and, after divulging they owed guns all they had to do was prove/show that they had a gun safe which would secure all of them. The brother/sister are now living on said farm and learning gun safety and shooting and are in 'hog heaven' !!
The particulars of this incident don't concern me directly, as it's probably a bit late in life for me to have children. However, any govt. intrusion of this nature is of some concern. If they can get away with this, they can get away with other things. After all, they just reversed the "Docs vs. Glocks" law here in FL.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-29-2017, 06:33 AM
RKP's Avatar
RKP RKP is offline
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Gods country USA
Posts: 5,797
Thanks: 1,901
Thanked 781 Times in 255 Posts
Default

^^^ I'm right there with ya when it comes to 'fightin the fight' and 'nippin it in the bud' !!
__________________
Rich
COTEP #762

A gun is a tool, no better or no worse than any other tool: an axe, a shovel or anything. A gun is as good or as bad as the man using it. Remember that.

And shepherds we shall be, for Thee, my Lord, for Thee.
Power hath descended forth from Thy hand, that our feet may swiftly carry out Thy command.
So we shall flow a river forth to Thee, and teeming with souls shall it ever be.
In nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus Sancti.
Reply With Quote
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.