Off. Wilson has injuries
 

If this is indeed true, why wasn't it released sooner?

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2014...th-mike-brown/

BREAKING REPORT: Officer Darren Wilson Suffered “Orbital Blowout Fracture to Eye Socket” During Mike Brown Attack

Posted by Jim Hoft on Tuesday, August 19, 2014, 10:00 AM

The Gateway Pundit can now confirm from two local St. Louis sources that police Officer Darren Wilson suffered facial fractures during his confrontation with deceased 18 year-old Michael Brown. Officer Wilson clearly feared for his life during the incident that led to the shooting death of Brown. This was after Michael Brown and his accomplice Dorian Johnson robbed a local Ferguson convenience store.


Local St. Louis sources said Wilson suffered an “orbital blowout fracture to the eye socket.” This comes from a source within the District Attorney’s office and confirmed by the St. Louis County Police.

A blowout fracture is a fracture of one or more of the bones surrounding the eye and is commonly referred to as an orbital floor fracture. (AAPOS)

This comes after St. Louis Post-Dispatch reporter tweeted out last night that a dozen local witnesses confirmed Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson’s version of the Brown shooting story.

Hmmmmmm, so, he did not just shoot him out of racism? Interesting...:rolleyes:

Funny how this info is always held back till after all the crap rolls downhill. What is Jessie Jackwagon saying now?

It did not fit Holder's agenda. THAT is why it wasn't released earlier. Just like the whole Zimmerman/Martin thing, the admins assertions will prove false

Well I hate to say it but if they would have just let the police/dea/dci whom ever complete the investigation and let the facts come out things might have been different from the get go. I don't think that the PD knew what to do with this event. they shoudl have been more forthcomming with info. Now its way out of controll....this is really sad all around.

Would love to share this but the link isn't working.

The term I hear most is "follies"........Local PD was in over their head, was obvious when their Top Cop was damn near stuttering through a Q&A with reporters.

Zackly...they are not prepared for such an event. When this went down no matter what it was a higher agency should of stepped in, that was the point i was trying to make in my ramblings.

they just had no experiance in such an event.....it was as bad as my spelling skills

I hate to differ, but I think it is good to withhold this type of information until the usual suspects have gone on the record with outlandish BS. Then release the facts, and make them look foolish. Like the so-called witness, who has now been caught in several lies.

On the contrary, releasing this info earlier could've saved hundreds of thousands of dollars in tax payers money for the extra police, Nat. Guard, etc. Not to mention all the money that the businesses and other property that were lost due to the vandalism and looting.

Withholding info and releasing it later makes it look like they were trying to hide something and came up with an escape route.

Never the less, what happened was unfortunate and shouldn't have happened.

Just my opinion.

I understand, per a Q&A on TV, that releasing the info after proper documentation is standard procedure, but,this situation, I feel, needed swift transparency. I agree with Ell, alot of hurt, destruction and theft could have been avoided.

Exactly, they will think the story and injuries were concocted to get the cop off. If you explain the injuries sustained by the cop and the preliminary finding then you don't allow the "hands up, don't shoot" to take root. Now it has grown beyond the incident and is being used as an excuse regardless of the facts of the case.

I just hate to agree with Ellison ;) but I think this is a true statement. To release what they know as soon they know makes the public feel better.

Nah. Soon as the TV cameras hit the streets, these folks new they had a gullible partner to spew.

You make a good point; but, I think the looting, protests and consequent expenditures would not have been avoided with earlier disclosure of some of the facts. The protests started right away, followed shortly thereafter by looting, tossing bottles, etc. And, contrary to the family's attorneys, who can say whatever they want whether accurate or not, the authorities have to wait for investigations to be concluded, facts established beyond some degree of doubt, etc. before they can come forth with statements.

Look at it this way, the available facts are now out there via the autopsies, the statement about injuries to the officer, yet the protests and looting continue. The facts didn't stop or slow it down. Just my take on it.

I think you and I should team up and start our own talk show...I think we'd make a good pay. East coast/west coast! :D

Sign me up! nanner