COTEP.org  

Go Back   COTEP.org > Main Category > Main Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-28-2012, 12:43 AM
dw1911's Avatar
dw1911 dw1911 is offline
Founding Member
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Rural Southwest Virginia
Posts: 2,351
Thanks: 618
Thanked 1,547 Times in 465 Posts
Angry What does it take? 4 People are DEAD! 2 Navy Seals AND 1 Embassador too


Clark’s line of questioning was seemingly different than the president usually faces from a media that has been friendly to him.

The 9News reporter also asked Obama about his previous calls for more “civility” in the race, calling him out for calling Romney a “bullsh**ter in a Rolling Stone interview.

“What did you mean and why did you choose that word?” he asked.

“You know, this was a conversation after an interview, a casual conversation with a reporter,” Obama explained.

“The basic point that I’ve been talking about throughout this campaign, is people know what I mean and they know that I mean what I say and what I care about, who I’m fighting for and you know a major issue in any election is can you count on the person you’re putting into the Oval Office fighting for you having a clear set of convictions that they believe in.”

Finally, Obama was asked to address his administration’s decision to give stimulus funds to Abound Solar, a Colorado company with ties to one of the president’s billionaire fundraisers. The company has since gone out of business and is now under criminal investigation, Clark reports.

After laughing, Obama said: “Well, Kyle, I think that if you look at our record that these loans that are given out by the Department of Energy for clean energy have created jobs all across the country and only about four percent of these loans were going to some very cutting-edge industries that are going to allow us to figure out how to produce energy in a clean, renewable way in the future and create jobs in Colorado and all around the country.”
__________________
1911 Pistols can be additive!
COTEP CBOB0586
No freeman shall be debarred the use of arms.
Thomas Jefferson
“Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.” Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-28-2012, 12:52 AM
dw1911's Avatar
dw1911 dw1911 is offline
Founding Member
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Rural Southwest Virginia
Posts: 2,351
Thanks: 618
Thanked 1,547 Times in 465 Posts
Angry More on this. It's Impeachable. Watergate was minor in comparison

( copied from the source):
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-...54/postsAuthor ^ | 10/14/2012 | Kozy

Posted on Sunday, October 14, 2012 11:28:48 AM by Kozy

The murder of Ambassador ns at Benghazi is Obama's October surprise gone bad thanks to two former SEALS who were not supposed to be at Benghazi. But then I ran to the end of the story so let's back fill the datapoints.

First President Morsi first public statement to us was that he wanted the blind iman who first bombed the WTC released. Now Obama forever dedicated to appeasing the muslim world, bowing to them comes natural to him, knew that he had to obey Morsi's request however he couldn't release Omar Abdul-Rahman. There had to be a reason powerful enough to warrant his release. What better than to return to the Carter era of American hostages?

Obama sees a way to release the iman and secure his reelection in one act. So the wheels are set in motion. So he needed a cover story. Oh, the You Tube video that no one has seen, released in July. America could be shamed into releasing the iman because someone posted an obscure video and we have to follow Obama's lead and bow to muslims.

Next weaken the security at Benghazi by removing the security teams and employing Libyan bodyguards for the ambassador. In effect the embassy could not defend itself. The back channel had to be from the WH to the iman's legal representatives. It was suggested that Obama needed a reason to release the iman that America could agree to. What better than hostages? They were informed that there were no security forces at Benghazi to defend ns so over run the embassy and take him hostage. Really easy.

What was not planned for were former SEALS Donerty and Woods. They were not part of ns security detail; they happened to be in Benghazi working for the CIA to located missing surface-to-air missiles.

So the terrorists plan the assault on the embassy thinking there would be no resistance. Well two SEALS never back down from defending America and Americans. These two heros gave their lives fighting to protect our embassy and our ambassador. No telling how many peaceful muslim they transported to the after life however the terrorists who thought this was just a walk in the park protect now sought out the Americans to kill them not hold them captive. The over throw went from hostage taking to killing.

Now the WH knew the plan had blown up. There were no hostages only dead Americans. How to cover? Roll out the 14 minute video, no one has seen, as the cause. The WH cover up was in play.

With the killing of Ambassador ns, there could be no exchange, no October surprise. Oh what was the October surprise? Well Obama would spend a month negotiating with the terrorists for the release of Ambassador ns and finally and after his focused efforts on saving ns' live, ns would be released just before the election. Obama would have sucked out all the energy from the campaign as everyone would be watching him, the Nobel Peace Prize winner, negotiate for the release of ns. The world would applaud him, the muslim would have their murderous iman back, he would be reelected and the destruction of America who go on.

We can only thank every day these SEALS for defending America with their lives.

A lot of datapoints, Benghazi, President Morsi, SEALS, blind iman, 14 minute You Tube video; withdrawal of security from embassy, October surprise and Obama's October surprise.

Wonder which story makes more sense? Mine or the one the WH spins every day that keeps changing as the lies are exposed.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: alteredsource; benghazi; benghazigate; octobersurprise; seals; vanity
__________________
1911 Pistols can be additive!
COTEP CBOB0586
No freeman shall be debarred the use of arms.
Thomas Jefferson
“Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.” Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-28-2012, 01:02 AM
dw1911's Avatar
dw1911 dw1911 is offline
Founding Member
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Rural Southwest Virginia
Posts: 2,351
Thanks: 618
Thanked 1,547 Times in 465 Posts
Default WE should ALL write, call our reps.

http://markamerica.com/2012/10/27/ki...e-white-house/
__________________
1911 Pistols can be additive!
COTEP CBOB0586
No freeman shall be debarred the use of arms.
Thomas Jefferson
“Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.” Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-28-2012, 01:09 AM
dw1911's Avatar
dw1911 dw1911 is offline
Founding Member
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Rural Southwest Virginia
Posts: 2,351
Thanks: 618
Thanked 1,547 Times in 465 Posts
Default He has to go! Like Carter did.

http://patriotsforamerica.ning.com/f...opics/murderer
__________________
1911 Pistols can be additive!
COTEP CBOB0586
No freeman shall be debarred the use of arms.
Thomas Jefferson
“Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.” Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-28-2012, 10:07 AM
Roverron's Avatar
Roverron Roverron is offline
Founding Member
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: USA, America
Posts: 3,974
Thanks: 71
Thanked 540 Times in 279 Posts
Default

How about this? You think he may think he's already gone?

http://weeklywor******.com/politics/...ate-in-hawaii/

http://www.HillBuzz.org

The $35 Million estate www.HillBuzz.org is reporting as Obama’s next residence.

Apparently, Michelle’s mom is spilling the beans. A live-in resident of the White House, Barack’s mother-in-law is telling friends of the Obamas’ plans to move to Hawaii in January 2013. Plans that will include Michelle’s mom, since she lives with them.

Chicago and its corrupt Democratic machinery served its use, so now Barack is done with them. And, now that he apparently knows it’s all but over for a second term as our Socialist, Massive-Debt-Creator-in Chief he’s making plans to sell his Chicago home and move to Hawaii.

HillBuzz has the scoop,

Barack and Michelle Obama will be moving to Hawaii in January of 2013 and preparations are now being made to purchase an estate in close proximity to land owned by the University of Hawaii, where the Obama presidential library and “political center” will be located.

Here in Chicago, it’s pretty obvious that Michelle does not want to move back to this city and its winters (for any reason) and Michelle’s mother, who’s been living in the White House with her daughter and her family, will be happily making the move to Hawaii as well.

I have a friend whose family knows Michelle’s mother; they have been crystal clear that the elderly Mrs. Robinson regularly says that she’ll be in Hawaii next year permanently with her daughter and granddaughters. There is neither talk of returning to Chicago to live nor of living in the White House for another four years — instead, there’s a sense of “it was fun while it lasted” coming from Mrs. Robinson in her talks with her Chicago friends. …

UPDATE #2: Found it! Here’s the only property that matches all the clues we’ve been given. It is on the market for $35 million, which matches what Mrs. Robinson has been saying about the “$35 million house she’d be living in soon”. …

Who is funding this potential move?

The Obamas’ last home was purchased by a rich felon from Chicago. So, it’s no surprise that it looks like another rich Chicagoan is going to buy his next home, too…Chicago’s Hyatt Hotel heiress.
__________________
Ron
#CBOB0604
Proud Member: "Team Ranstad"
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-28-2012, 11:31 AM
Riverpigusmc's Avatar
Riverpigusmc Riverpigusmc is offline
Founding Member
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Archer, Florida CSA
Posts: 13,002
Blog Entries: 6
Thanks: 1,963
Thanked 3,495 Times in 720 Posts
Default

and so it goes
__________________
NRA Life Member
Wilson Combat CQB
Kimber Tactical Pro II
S&W J-Frame .38
ect
" I don't own the clothes I'm wearin', and the road goes on forever "

There's a gator in the bushes, and it's calling my name...
COTEP #523
Reply With Quote
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.