Nuclear "Fudds..."

[FfNJGTFO]

Preface: The following is a reprint of a thread I started a while back in a different forum. Thought I'd bring it here to gather additional thoughts.

----------------------------------

I'm fighting a battle on one of my other forums. There are some who believe that RKBA should be absolute and totally unrestricted... even if it means that a private citizen, who could afford it, could possess and own such things as Nukes, SMAWs, Stingers, Cruise missiles, etc. etc. etc. They argue that it was the Founding Father's intent for "We the People" to do just that. That said, the Founding Fathers didn't have nukes etc. to deal with. If they had, I wonder if they'd have been so "approving..."

FTR, I get the concept of an "unrestricted" RKBA. And I fully support it for conventional firearms, including NFA, full auto, etc... But I'd be very nervous if I saw my neighbor building a silo in their back yard and filling it with something. Not only would I be concerned in re: their training on the weapon, but also, they just made their property (and mine by proxy) a "1st strike" target!

Does that make me a "Nuclear Fudd?"

Discuss...